Screener
GMF vs FLAX
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both GMF and FLAX are equity ETFs. GMF charges 0.49% a year and FLAX 0.19%. The main difference: GMF covers emerging markets; FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- GMF covers emerging markets; FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLAX costs 0.30% less per year.
- GMF is much larger than FLAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $406M | $52M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +44.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.01% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -42.51% |
Similar to GMF and FLAX
Explore further