Screener
ASGM vs FAAR
Virtus Alphasimplex Global Macro Etf vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- ASGM costs 0.12% less per year.
- FAAR is significantly larger than ASGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASGM covers global markets; FAAR covers north america.
- ASGM follows a systematic alpha strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASGM | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.86% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $168M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -6.62% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASGM and FAAR
Explore further