Screener
FAAR vs FMF
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Key differences
- FAAR follows a long short strategy; FMF uses managed futures.
- Over the last 3 years, FAAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAAR | FMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $168M | $266M |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 9.07% | 5.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.1% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.0% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.44% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -18.03% | -16.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAAR and FMF
Explore further