Screener
ASIA vs JPAN
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Matthews Japan Active ETF
Key differences
- ASIA is significantly larger than JPAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASIA follows a active selection strategy; JPAN uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | JPAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $8M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 19.88% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -15.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and JPAN
Explore further