Screener
ASIA vs MKOR
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Matthews Korea Active ETF
Key differences
- MKOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | MKOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $124M |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +171.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 36.12% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -22.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and MKOR
Explore further