Screener
ASMF vs AGOX
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- ASMF costs 0.53% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than ASMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASMF follows a managed futures strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASMF | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $364M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.3% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.10% | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -15.30% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASMF and AGOX
Explore further