Screener
ASMF vs FAAR
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- ASMF costs 0.18% less per year.
- FAAR is significantly larger than ASMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASMF covers global markets; FAAR covers north america.
- ASMF follows a managed futures strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASMF | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $168M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.3% | +41.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.10% | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -15.30% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASMF and FAAR
Explore further