Screener
ATFV vs ACES
Alger 35 ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ATFV follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ATFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ATFV | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $141M | $127M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.0% | +55.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.5% | -2.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.64% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -45.34% | -79.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ATFV and ACES
Explore further