Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ATMP vs AMUB

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN vs UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B

ATMP

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN

Barclays

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$657M

AMUB

UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B

UBS

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$39M

Key differences

  • AMUB costs 0.15% less per year.
  • ATMP is significantly larger than AMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, ATMP has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ATMPAMUB
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.80%
Fund size (AUM)$657M$39M
Since20132015
Dividend yield4.41%4.14%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+26.9%+24.9%
CAGR 3Y+28.9%+23.4%
CAGR 5Y+24.3%+21.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.431.17
Volatility 1Y14.07%13.53%
Max drawdown-70.30%-73.46%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ATMP and AMUB