Screener
AUMI vs GOAU
Themes Gold Miners ETF vs U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
Key differences
- AUMI costs 0.25% less per year.
- GOAU is significantly larger than AUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AUMI follows a index tracking strategy; GOAU uses active selection.
- GOAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AUMI | GOAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $187M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.8% | +48.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +31.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.96% | 45.60% |
| Max drawdown | -31.88% | -55.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AUMI and GOAU
Explore further