Screener
GOAU vs RING
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.21% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than GOAU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GOAU follows a active selection strategy; RING uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GOAU | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $187M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +80.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.8% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | +19.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.60% | 45.82% |
| Max drawdown | -55.41% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GOAU and RING
Explore further