Screener
BAB vs INTM
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF
Key differences
- BAB costs 0.07% less per year.
- BAB is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAB follows a index tracking strategy; INTM uses active selection.
- BAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAB | INTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $101M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.80% | -2.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAB and INTM
Explore further