Screener
INTM vs PVI
Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF vs Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.10% less per year.
- INTM is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTM follows a active selection strategy; PVI uses index tracking.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTM | PVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $31M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.61% |
| Max drawdown | -2.65% | -1.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTM and PVI
Explore further