Screener
BAB vs PFIG
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.06% less per year.
- BAB is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PFIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAB | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $113M |
| Since | 2009 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.97% | 3.10% |
| Max drawdown | -27.80% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAB and PFIG
Explore further