Screener
PFIG vs GTO
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.13% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFIG follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and GTO
Explore further