Screener
BAFE vs GSIE
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSIE costs 0.29% less per year.
- GSIE is significantly larger than BAFE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAFE follows a active selection strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
- GSIE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAFE | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $5.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.12% | 14.23% |
| Max drawdown | -18.37% | -34.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAFE and GSIE
Explore further