Screener
BAFE vs GSLC
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.45% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than BAFE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAFE follows a active selection strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAFE | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $15.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.12% | 11.85% |
| Max drawdown | -18.37% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAFE and GSLC
Explore further