Screener
BAGY vs BITI
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF vs ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- BAGY costs 0.36% less per year.
- BITI is significantly larger than BAGY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAGY is classified as alternative, while BITI is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- BAGY follows a option income strategy; BITI uses inverse.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAGY | BITI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $187M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 49.10% | 9.25% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -28.5% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -37.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.28% | 43.05% |
| Max drawdown | -47.52% | -92.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAGY and BITI
Explore further