Screener
BAI vs RGLO
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.06% less per year.
- BAI is significantly larger than RGLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAI covers global markets; RGLO covers north america.
- BAI follows a active selection strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAI | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $309M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +98.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.44% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.09% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAI and RGLO
Explore further