Screener
BAIV vs AOM
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 0.45% less per year.
- AOM is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while AOM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.04% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and AOM
Explore further