Screener
BAIV vs CGHM
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
Key differences
- CGHM costs 0.26% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while CGHM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; CGHM covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; CGHM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -5.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and CGHM
Explore further