Screener
BAIV vs CGMU
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.33% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; CGMU covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.35% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and CGMU
Explore further