Screener
BAIV vs GTO
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.25% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while GTO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; GTO covers north america.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.75% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and GTO
Explore further