Screener
GTO vs PICB
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.15% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than PICB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; PICB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PICB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PICB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | PICB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $360M |
| Since | 2016 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 3.29% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 7.88% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -37.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and PICB
Explore further