Screener
BAIV vs HYEM
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- HYEM costs 0.20% less per year.
- HYEM is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while HYEM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; HYEM covers emerging markets.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; HYEM uses index tracking.
- HYEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | HYEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $504M |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.61% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.40% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -30.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and HYEM
Explore further