Screener
BAIV vs EMBX
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- BAIV costs 0.16% less per year.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while EMBX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $244M |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.51% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.86% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and EMBX
Explore further