Screener
BAIV vs IJH
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJH costs 0.55% less per year.
- IJH is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IJH covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IJH uses index tracking.
- IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $115.7B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.73% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -42.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IJH
Explore further