Screener
BAIV vs IJR
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJR costs 0.54% less per year.
- IJR is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IJR covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IJR uses index tracking.
- IJR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $102.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.70% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -44.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IJR
Explore further