Screener
BAIV vs IOO
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
Key differences
- IOO costs 0.20% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IOO uses index tracking.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.60% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IOO
Explore further