Screener
BAIV vs IXUS
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.53% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IXUS covers global ex us.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IXUS uses index tracking.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $56.2B |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.40% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -36.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IXUS
Explore further