Screener
BAIV vs PGX
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGX costs 0.10% less per year.
- PGX is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while PGX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; PGX covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.16% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.14% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and PGX
Explore further