Screener
PGX vs AAPR
Invesco Preferred ETF vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2026
Key differences
- PGX costs 0.29% less per year.
- PGX is significantly larger than AAPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGX is classified as fixed income, while AAPR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PGX follows a index tracking strategy; AAPR uses structured outcome.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGX | AAPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $52M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.16% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.2% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.15% | 2.45% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -5.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGX and AAPR
Explore further