Screener
BALQ vs BINC
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BALQ costs 0.05% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than BALQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BALQ follows a index tracking strategy; BINC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BALQ | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $16.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -11.79% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BALQ and BINC
Explore further