Screener
BAMA vs KEAT
Brookstone Active ETF vs Keating Active ETF
Key differences
BAMA is a mixed asset ETF, while KEAT is an equity ETF. BAMA charges 0.99% a year and KEAT 0.85%.
- BAMA is a mixed asset fund, while KEAT is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KEAT costs 0.14% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMA | KEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $123M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 2.24% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.3% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.51% | 10.47% |
| Max drawdown | -12.27% | -7.45% |
Similar to BAMA and KEAT
Explore further