Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KEAT vs BAMY

Keating Active ETF vs Brookstone Yield ETF

KEAT

Keating Active ETF

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$123M

BAMY

Brookstone Yield ETF

Annual cost

1.46%

Fund size

$46M

Key differences

KEAT is an equity ETF, while BAMY is an alternative ETF. KEAT charges 0.85% a year and BAMY 1.46%.

  • KEAT is an equity fund, while BAMY is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • KEAT costs 0.61% less per year.

Side-by-side comparison

KEATBAMY
Annual cost (TER)0.85%1.46%
Fund size (AUM)$123M$46M
Since20242023
Dividend yield2.24%6.93%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+23.4%+10.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y10.47%4.63%
Max drawdown-7.45%-6.03%

Similar to KEAT and BAMY