Screener
BAMA vs MATE
Brookstone Active ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
BAMA is a fixed income ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. BAMA charges 0.99% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- BAMA is a fixed income fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BAMA follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMA | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $39M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.74% | — |
| Max drawdown | -12.27% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.