Screener
MATE vs BAMO
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Key differences
MATE is an alternative ETF, while BAMO is a fixed income ETF. MATE charges 0.97% a year and BAMO 1.06%.
- MATE is an alternative fund, while BAMO is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; BAMO uses active selection.
- MATE costs 0.09% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | BAMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $49M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.65% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -12.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.