Screener
BAMG vs IWF
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both BAMG and IWF are equity ETFs. BAMG charges 0.89% a year and IWF 0.18%. The main difference: BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- IWF costs 0.71% less per year.
- IWF is much larger than BAMG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $132.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.71% | 15.79% |
| Max drawdown | -21.00% | -32.72% |
Similar to BAMG and IWF
Explore further