Screener
BAMG vs IWO
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both BAMG and IWO are equity ETFs. BAMG charges 0.89% a year and IWO 0.24%. The main difference: BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- BAMG follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- IWO costs 0.65% less per year.
- IWO is much larger than BAMG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAMG | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $14.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.71% | 21.80% |
| Max drawdown | -21.00% | -42.01% |
Similar to BAMG and IWO
Explore further