Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BAMO vs BAMA

Brookstone Opportunities ETF vs Brookstone Active ETF

BAMO

Brookstone Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

1.06%

Fund size

$49M

BAMA

Brookstone Active ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$53M

Key differences

Both BAMO and BAMA are mixed asset ETFs. BAMO charges 1.06% a year and BAMA 0.99%. The main difference: BAMA costs 0.07% less per year.

  • BAMA costs 0.07% less per year.

Side-by-side comparison

BAMOBAMA
Annual cost (TER)1.06%0.99%
Fund size (AUM)$49M$53M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.46%1.31%
Asset classmixed assetmixed asset
Region
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+13.1%+17.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y6.51%9.51%
Max drawdown-12.72%-12.27%

Similar to BAMO and BAMA