Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BAMO vs BAMV

Brookstone Opportunities ETF vs Brookstone Value Stock ETF

BAMO

Brookstone Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

1.06%

Fund size

$49M

BAMV

Brookstone Value Stock ETF

Annual cost

0.91%

Fund size

$102M

Key differences

BAMO is a mixed asset ETF, while BAMV is an equity ETF. BAMO charges 1.06% a year and BAMV 0.91%.

  • BAMO is a mixed asset fund, while BAMV is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BAMV costs 0.15% less per year.

Side-by-side comparison

BAMOBAMV
Annual cost (TER)1.06%0.91%
Fund size (AUM)$49M$102M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.46%1.27%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+13.1%+15.1%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y6.51%11.87%
Max drawdown-12.72%-14.56%

Similar to BAMO and BAMV