Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BAMV vs VTHR

Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund ETF Shares

BAMV

Brookstone Value Stock ETF

Annual cost

0.91%

Fund size

$102M

VTHR

Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund ETF Shares

Annual cost

0.06%

Fund size

$6.1B

Key differences

Both BAMV and VTHR are equity ETFs. BAMV charges 0.91% a year and VTHR 0.06%. The main difference: BAMV follows a active selection strategy; VTHR uses index tracking.

  • BAMV follows a active selection strategy; VTHR uses index tracking.
  • VTHR costs 0.85% less per year.
  • VTHR is much larger than BAMV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • VTHR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BAMVVTHR
Annual cost (TER)0.91%0.06%
Fund size (AUM)$102M$6.1B
Since20232010
Dividend yield1.27%1.00%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+15.1%+24.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+22.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.15
Volatility 1Y11.87%12.58%
Max drawdown-14.56%-34.61%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BAMV and VTHR