Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BAMV vs VTWO

Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares

BAMV

Brookstone Value Stock ETF

Annual cost

0.91%

Fund size

$102M

VTWO

Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares

Annual cost

0.06%

Fund size

$17.5B

Key differences

Both BAMV and VTWO are equity ETFs. BAMV charges 0.91% a year and VTWO 0.06%. The main difference: BAMV follows a active selection strategy; VTWO uses index tracking.

  • BAMV follows a active selection strategy; VTWO uses index tracking.
  • VTWO costs 0.85% less per year.
  • VTWO is much larger than BAMV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • VTWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BAMVVTWO
Annual cost (TER)0.91%0.06%
Fund size (AUM)$102M$17.5B
Since20232010
Dividend yield1.27%1.07%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+15.1%+36.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.0%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.76
Volatility 1Y11.87%19.46%
Max drawdown-14.56%-41.19%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BAMV and VTWO