Screener
BASG vs IWP
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWP costs 0.38% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASG covers global markets; IWP covers north america.
- BASG follows a active selection strategy; IWP uses index tracking.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASG | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $19.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.56% |
| Max drawdown | -19.30% | -38.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASG and IWP
Explore further