Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BBEM vs GEM

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

BBEM

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$853M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both BBEM and GEM are equity ETFs. BBEM charges 0.15% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: BBEM follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • BBEM follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • BBEM costs 0.20% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BBEMGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$853M$1.7B
Since20232015
Dividend yield2.72%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+40.3%+41.2%
CAGR 3Y+20.3%+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.921.00
Volatility 1Y20.57%20.62%
Max drawdown-17.42%-37.02%

Similar to BBEM and GEM