Screener
GEM vs BBAX
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
Key differences
Both GEM and BBAX are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and BBAX 0.19%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; BBAX uses index tracking.
- GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; BBAX uses index tracking.
- GEM covers emerging markets; BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- BBAX costs 0.16% less per year.
- BBAX is much larger than GEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEM | BBAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $6.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 3.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.2% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.6% | +4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.62% | 14.74% |
| Max drawdown | -37.02% | -39.64% |
Similar to GEM and BBAX
Explore further