Screener
BBH vs ANGL
VanEck Biotech ETF vs VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.10% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBH is classified as equity, while ANGL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | ANGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $365M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2011 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 6.31% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.82% | 4.34% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -29.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BBH and ANGL
Explore further