Screener
BBH vs SMH
VanEck Biotech ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $365M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2011 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | +139.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | +65.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +38.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.21 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.82% | 30.31% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BBH and SMH
Explore further