Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SMH vs PPH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$58.8B

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$966M

Key differences

  • SMH is significantly larger than PPH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SMHPPH
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$58.8B$966M
Since20112011
Dividend yield0.22%2.12%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+139.4%+24.5%
CAGR 3Y+65.2%+12.6%
CAGR 5Y+38.8%+9.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.520.63
Volatility 1Y30.31%17.07%
Max drawdown-45.30%-29.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SMH and PPH