Screener
See all growth funds
BBH vs XLV
VanEck Biotech ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
Both BBH and XLV are equity ETFs. BBH charges 0.35% a year and XLV 0.08%. The main difference: XLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLV is much larger than BBH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $367M | $38.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 1.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.9% | +15.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.6% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -28.40% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.